The Trouble with Jesus

by Constance Hastings

How to Get a Divorce
September 30, 2024

The Trouble with Jesus is he doesn’t speak from a legalistic mindset.

He speaks with the loving mind of God.

“Should a man be allowed to divorce his wife?”

It was an explosive question in the first century and still has its ramifications two millennia later. Under what grounds should divorce be taken? When both people find they are incompatible? When there is a relationship based on emotional, physical, sexual abuse? When values change to differing perspectives? What is the situation which should permit persons to throw in the towel and call it quits?


Except…when Pharisees brought this question to Jesus, it wasn’t that they were looking for honest clarification on marriages gone bad. Behind it, and granted this wasn’t the only time this kind of thing happened, they were trying to trap him. If he disagreed with the ancient Mosaic law, they could make a big deal of it by trying to discredit him among his many followers.


And to add more spark to the tinder, everyone knew it was this kind of thing that got John the Baptist beheaded. He was imprisoned and ultimately executed for criticizing Herodias for her divorce so she could marry Herod.  Should Jesus likewise make a similar reference, they could slyly suggest to the Roman rulers Jesus should share the same fate. Slick were they.


Instead, using the age-old tactic of debate, Jesus parries their attack with another question. “What did Moses the law-giver have to say about it?” Sounds fair enough; go back to the ancient laws on which all good Jews base their lives. That’s where these holy henchmen were headed anyway.


The Loophole

It turns out there is a passage which allowed for divorce, Deuteronomy 24:1-4.   They summarized it as all a man had to do was to hand his wife divorce papers and kick her out the door. Done. Nothing about any appeals on her side or what her rights in the relationship were. If she displeased her husband, she was history.


Maybe the Pharisees brought up this question because they noticed something about Jesus with which they could hook him. He didn’t seem to understand or value the way the world worked, how to get ahead in the world you need to play up to the power brokers and influencers in the world. Instead, he championed the losers, the ones who had fallen so low they looked up at bottom. He was known for saying things like, “Anyone who wants to be first must take last place and be the servant of all.”  Then there were his stories of lost sheep and lost sons. (Luke 15)  Don’t forget how he’d also accepted people who were not of the children of Abraham. (Matthew 15: 21-28) A guy like that would take the side of women who often lost it all on the whim of a man. In the end, Jesus had no friends in high places, and they could get him dismissed without a ripple of protest from the big-shots they played with.


They were right. Yet, without their realizing it, Jesus had turned their question away from what was a statement of a man’s right in a relationship, turning it from their cherished legalism to God’s intention of marriage. Ok, Jesus dug some of his own hole when he did it but count that up to how he penetrated their phony portrayals of the holy.


Sure, Moses permitted divorce but “only as a concession to your hard-hearted wickedness.” Jesus then took them to the creation story, a story which preceded the law and was based in God’s original design of creation including man and woman in God’s own image. He quoted how the two are to become united as one, and in that union intended by God there should be no separation.


Which means….? Jesus was forbidding divorce! No way out once the pact is made? It’s for life as far as God is concerned? Look around, will you. In today’s world, this’ll never work. Don’t think we side with the Pharisee’s scheming plot to erase this rabbi, but this idea just isn’t going to fly with more than half the people we know.


How God Feels About It

Yeah, that’s the point. People aren’t perfect. Know though Jesus was giving them the ideal, God’s plan for the highest relationship known to humans and what that should mean. True, the ancient writings record God as saying, “I hate divorce!”  Hear that though not as a statement of anger and rage but as one of divine agony when relationship is broken. The pain of divorce hurts God as much as nails pounded through flesh and bone.


In effect, Jesus’ words were not so much about when divorce should be legal but rather what marriage is meant to be. In its best form, marriage reflects God’s love, a love that is not conditional, a love that is eternal in its caring, honoring, knowing and being known in faithful devotion to and trust in one another. As it is, when relationships fail, it’s a failure in upholding the love of God.


Whereas the Pharisees’ question has its basis of concern in only a man’s right in the relationship, Jesus later expanded it in responsibility and accountability for both men and women. In short, whenever a person divorces and remarries, it is the same as adultery. A divorce decree does not nullify the commitment made in heaven. That is, God does not forget it.


How Could God Forget?

Interestingly, the next scene is of Jesus reprimanding the disciples for not allowing parents with children to have access to him. Inherent in children are the emotional commitments of the relationship that created them. It’s as if there’s within each being a spiritual DNA which tells a person from whom they came and to whom they belong. Regardless of the reason a relationship may be broken, it never goes away. As God loves and wants to be loved exclusively forever, so relationships should never have anyone else take its place.


At the center of that God-Marriage relationship is grace. People aren’t perfect, and marriages which extend grace to each other operate and are sustained by it. At its foundation is extending love to the other as they are and allowing them to love you as they can. Similarly, God offers forgiveness and mercy when a relationship with God in Jesus is also dishonored or broken.


Even so, Jesus welcomed the children, for in their vulnerability children are drawn toward and trust the love that comes to them only because they are who they are. It wasn’t that they were or ever could be perfect kids; neither will any of us ever be perfect either. Jesus loved that they were brought to him by imperfect parents with imperfect relationships with a hope that by being touched, taken into Jesus’ arms and blessed, these children would know God’s merciful love. So may we.

Mark 10:2-12


The Trouble with Jesus: Considerations Before You Walk Away by Constance Hastings

 Support Your Local Independent Bookstores and Click Here!


Subscribe to The Trouble with Jesus Blog Here


The Trouble with Jesus is he comes between what controls us and who we are made to be.
By Constance Hastings June 16, 2025
The Trouble with Jesus is he comes between what controls us and who we are made to be.
The Trouble with Jesus is if what he said were easy, would it mean anything, have real significance.
By Constance Hastings June 9, 2025
The Trouble with Jesus is what he said about himself, where he came from, and for what reasons can make you feel like you’ve got no chance of getting anywhere near something in which to believe. Yet, if it was easy, would it mean anything, have any real significance?
The Trouble with Jesus is he wants to be a Lover in the fullest sense a soul could know.
By Constance Hastings June 2, 2025
The Trouble with Jesus is he wants to be a Lover in the fullest sense a soul could know.
The Trouble with Jesus is he left his job undone, and he did it on purpose.
By Constance Hastings May 28, 2025
They had no idea what they were getting into when he had recruited them for his purposes. Some say they weren’t the brightest bulbs on the street. The only attribute which spoke most for them was they were teachable…
The Trouble with Jesus is relationships take work...But the rough spots are the growth spots.
By Constance Hastings May 26, 2025
The Trouble with Jesus is relationships take work, and the even the best, the closest will have rough spots. But the rough spots are the growth spots.
The Trouble with Jesus: He had this knack of asking people ridiculous questions...
By Constance Hastings May 19, 2025
The Trouble with Jesus is he had this insightful and irritating knack of asking people ridiculous questions, questions that bury the real question.
The Trouble with Jesus:  To be Loved, one must be one with the Lover, to Love as he Loved.
By Constance Hastings May 12, 2025
Got to give it to you, Jesus. It’s your best line, perfect for pastoral memes and sticks well on car bumpers. “New commandment,” you said, “Love one another.” Why didn’t anyone else think of this? ... But to be real, for all the wonderful sentiment, it’s better known as the Hallmark of Hypocrisy, chief among them those who claim you as Christian. When it comes to divisiveness, angry labels, and best of all, judgmental attitudes, your people take the prize....
The Trouble with Jesus is how he drags his identity through diverse filters.
By Constance Hastings May 5, 2025
Jesus, just for the record, tell us again, are you who you say you are? Or maybe who some say you are? Give it to us straight, in plain words, no dodging the question like a politician in prime-time cable interviews. Lord have mercy, the question never goes away. Jesus heard it face to face, answered it so many ways hoping to connect people’s heads to their souls. For some, it worked; for others, not so much.
The Trouble with Jesus goes deeper than what rationally should be required.
By Constance Hastings April 26, 2025
The love Jesus required was a love that would leave everything behind again, to leave one’s net and all that is held vital in life. It was a God-consuming love that meant nothing could be in front of it, not one’s security and safety in life nor one’s understanding of all God meant nor even one’s right to oneself.
The Trouble with Jesus: Faith must be linked with doubt to become belief.
By Constance Hastings April 21, 2025
Could it be that faith is not actually a fully convinced mindset? Could it be that to truly have faith an element of doubt, perceptions that rest in possibly not as much as in possibly so, is necessary? Do faith and doubt exist not as opposites but as integral parts of each other?
More Posts