The Trouble with Jesus

by Constance Hastings

An Extended Metaphor
August 10, 2024

The trouble with Jesus is he dangerously would take seemingly unlike things and put them together in a scandalous comparison, even if it meant being misunderstood.

Public scandals are America's favorite parlor sport.” Robert Dallek


Oh, this is great. Nothing like putting a little controversy out there to get attention. We know too well how this works. We’ve seen enough of it in politics, business, even the church. Am I supposed to dive right in and get mud on my face for joining the fight? Between the cat ladies and the weird, I’m just plain tired of this. What’s your point in putting that kind of talk out there in the first place? And don’t tell me that Jesus would have taken a position on this either. Geez, talk about asking for trouble.


Sure, it seems most weeks don’t pass without some whistleblower revealing less than honorable practices or the media pulling out ridiculous statements made by politicians years ago. You hope that whoever you are championing doesn’t get this kind of exposure. But note as well. Jesus also said some things that were more than attention-getters. More than once he sat right on the edge of being scandalous in the way he said things. Today is one of those.


“I assure you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you cannot have eternal life within you.” (John 6:53)


Yep, that’s right. Jesus is recorded as saying eat my flesh and drink my blood. It’s not fake news wrapped up in a conspiracy theory. What’s more, in this passage of merely eight verses, he said this or something to this effect five times. The repetition emphasizes how much he meant it. Taken literally, it will turn your stomach, packed with the overtones of cannibalism. What’s more, if it’s sickening to hear in this day and age, those who heard it in first century by the Sea of Galilee were even more repulsed.


There’s Scandal and Then There’s the Scandalous

This is one of those places where you have to put yourself in the shoes of someone not like you. These people were Jews, descendants of Abraham, schooled well in the Levitical law which determined much of their lifestyle. It set them apart from the culture of the day. They didn’t live like the rest of the world and that included what they ate.


It made life complicated. Go to the local market to buy food and you risked partaking in the unclean, pagan practices of the day. Most of the meat, in fact the better choice of meats, had been previously offered in sacrifice to please their foreign gods. In their minds, to eat of this meat would add an unacceptable layer of acceptance or tolerance to idolatry, allowing it as a source of nourishment, thus becoming pagan like it.


What’s more, an attitude toward blood was also integral to their faith practices. Drinking blood was expressly forbidden. (Leviticus 3:17) Blood was considered to be as vital to life as breath. In the formation of the human race, God breathed life, and blood coursing through the body sourced life throughout it. To ingest blood would be to eat what was sacred to God and therefore blasphemous, the desire to diminish God or be like God. So for Jesus to say eat my flash and drink my blood was a sacrilege.


You Are What You Eat

All of this builds on what Jesus had said earlier, “I am the Bread of Life.” The crowd knew well what had just happened a day or so earlier. Five thousand and more people had been fed.  It must have been a good meal for they were following him to get a second helping. But then he starts talking like this.


The trouble with Jesus is he dangerously would take two seemingly unlike things and put them together in a scandalous comparison, even if it meant being misunderstood. It’s called a metaphor. The literalism of both is not as significant as the qualities that the two both contain. So for Jesus to refer to himself as bread is to say he was like bread for the hungry soul. To find a filling of that empty soul one needs to take Jesus into one’s life in the similar sense of eating or drinking in order to satiate hunger or thirst. When you think about it, doesn’t that really sound a little tame?


Except…Jesus means it. And he means for those who hear this, 2000 years ago into today, to really get how much he means it. Sure, he starts off saying eat my flesh, but then he escalates into a more graphic depiction. “All who eat my flesh…” becomes not just a polite, etiquette correct bite-size portion but moves into gnaw on my flesh, crunch it between your teeth. It is meant to reflect the desperate, frantic, reckless eating when famished and needing to shovel food into the body to stave off that which will wither it into nothingness, into death.


Violent Words

An apology needs to be offered here. And that apology is for what’s been done to Jesus’ words and thus his message. Granted, the imagery of eating flesh and drinking blood is graphic. But if you’ve been trained and tricked into thinking Jesus was always all meek and mild, the ultimate nice guy, sorry to upset your fruity cart. Translators have done this like they’re trying to protect the Son of Man from some bad press. It doesn’t help though. It only dilutes who he is and what he came to give the world.


Jesus invites those who would be fed by him to gnaw, crunch, bite big and suck hard on his very being. Take him into your heart and soul. Don’t think you’ve got to keep your shirt clean. He wants to feed that part of you that feels, thinks, searches for love and purpose. Get messy with him. He got more than messy for you.


These words that Jesus used in the original Greek were tricky, graphic, somewhat horrific in where they would lead. It brings up an image of wild dogs feeding on a carcass. The violence in that portrayal isn’t pretty. But for the world to change and have hope of a life abundant now, starting now and never ending, it needs to feed deeply on the one who would give all of himself to that violence.


Bread of Life. Eat my flesh. Drink my blood. All are metaphors pointing to a greater truth. Not too much longer after Jesus made this scandalous statement, he raised bread and cup, saying, Eat, drink, this is my body and blood, given and poured out for you. (Luke 22:19-20) The metaphor is extended beyond comparison into a remembrance of his love, his own hungry desire to be the one who is the source of life for others.


“Anyone who eats this bread will live forever.”


John 6:51-58  


Like This? Find More in

The Trouble with Jesus: Considerations Before You Walk Away by Constance Hastings

Available Now Wherever You Love to Buy Books!


Subscribe to The Trouble with Jesus Blog Here.


The Trouble with Jesus is he comes between what controls us and who we are made to be.
By Constance Hastings June 16, 2025
The Trouble with Jesus is he comes between what controls us and who we are made to be.
The Trouble with Jesus is if what he said were easy, would it mean anything, have real significance.
By Constance Hastings June 9, 2025
The Trouble with Jesus is what he said about himself, where he came from, and for what reasons can make you feel like you’ve got no chance of getting anywhere near something in which to believe. Yet, if it was easy, would it mean anything, have any real significance?
The Trouble with Jesus is he wants to be a Lover in the fullest sense a soul could know.
By Constance Hastings June 2, 2025
The Trouble with Jesus is he wants to be a Lover in the fullest sense a soul could know.
The Trouble with Jesus is he left his job undone, and he did it on purpose.
By Constance Hastings May 28, 2025
They had no idea what they were getting into when he had recruited them for his purposes. Some say they weren’t the brightest bulbs on the street. The only attribute which spoke most for them was they were teachable…
The Trouble with Jesus is relationships take work...But the rough spots are the growth spots.
By Constance Hastings May 26, 2025
The Trouble with Jesus is relationships take work, and the even the best, the closest will have rough spots. But the rough spots are the growth spots.
The Trouble with Jesus: He had this knack of asking people ridiculous questions...
By Constance Hastings May 19, 2025
The Trouble with Jesus is he had this insightful and irritating knack of asking people ridiculous questions, questions that bury the real question.
The Trouble with Jesus:  To be Loved, one must be one with the Lover, to Love as he Loved.
By Constance Hastings May 12, 2025
Got to give it to you, Jesus. It’s your best line, perfect for pastoral memes and sticks well on car bumpers. “New commandment,” you said, “Love one another.” Why didn’t anyone else think of this? ... But to be real, for all the wonderful sentiment, it’s better known as the Hallmark of Hypocrisy, chief among them those who claim you as Christian. When it comes to divisiveness, angry labels, and best of all, judgmental attitudes, your people take the prize....
The Trouble with Jesus is how he drags his identity through diverse filters.
By Constance Hastings May 5, 2025
Jesus, just for the record, tell us again, are you who you say you are? Or maybe who some say you are? Give it to us straight, in plain words, no dodging the question like a politician in prime-time cable interviews. Lord have mercy, the question never goes away. Jesus heard it face to face, answered it so many ways hoping to connect people’s heads to their souls. For some, it worked; for others, not so much.
The Trouble with Jesus goes deeper than what rationally should be required.
By Constance Hastings April 26, 2025
The love Jesus required was a love that would leave everything behind again, to leave one’s net and all that is held vital in life. It was a God-consuming love that meant nothing could be in front of it, not one’s security and safety in life nor one’s understanding of all God meant nor even one’s right to oneself.
The Trouble with Jesus: Faith must be linked with doubt to become belief.
By Constance Hastings April 21, 2025
Could it be that faith is not actually a fully convinced mindset? Could it be that to truly have faith an element of doubt, perceptions that rest in possibly not as much as in possibly so, is necessary? Do faith and doubt exist not as opposites but as integral parts of each other?
More Posts